Paluu media-sivulle.

HANDICAPPED PEOPLE HAVE NO HUMAN RIGHTS IN FINLAND

Victims of being handicapped in an accident, a traffic accident or a malpractice have no Human Rights in Finland.
 
Insurance company doctor gives medical report saying 'patient capable to work' without committing a medical examination nor seeing [translator's remark: or meeting] the patient unless the patient has been declared a death certificate.
 
First appellate instance into victim of occupational injury complaints from Insurance Company's rejections is The Accident Prevention Appeal Board. This Boar's annual expense is taken care of Insurance Companies, which are also paying Board expense to Boards handling cases for traffic accident victims and malpractice cases.

Insurance Doctors working to Insurance Companies, as their Principal Employer, make hundreds unless thousands denials of being handicapped per year per doctor, and these same Insurance Company Doctors function in a Secondary Position, as Insurance Court's medical experts. [translator's remark: writer's disqualification thesis]
 
Insurance Doctor's medical statements for/in Insurance Court are declared under maintenance of secrecy, and in this way patients' access to their medical statement for Insurance Court is being rejected by Insurance Court's appeal of secrecy for negotiation. Would you call this honest and neutral juridical proceeding in a well-fare and legal State, or a relic from The Middle Ages?
 
Insurance Court functions as Insurance Companies' rubber stamp by blessing their rejections. Insurance Court's rejections are being blessed by Supreme Court, by either not granting a writ of certiorari or else rejecting the appeal.
 
Last appellate [translator's remark: Highest Appellate Instance] instance is European Court of Human Rights [link:/www.echr.coe.int/echr]. Patient can send a complaint about Insurance Court's unjustifiable decision to European Court of Human Rights to find State of Finland against him/her. From this Court Finland has been given several condemnatory decisions during the last years.
 
Now even European Court of Human Rights has renewed their appealing handling procedure, and possibly because there are hundreds of appeals annually due to Finnish Legal Bureau biased handling procedures.
 
Three sitting judges' 'committee' handling the case and one of the sitting judges is Matti Pellonpää in a composition.
 
Did you understand? Patient against State of Finland, where opposite's representative judge Matti Pellonpää is in the controls of making European Court of Human Rights judgment!
 
Is there still someone, who believes getting an independent, honest and fair trial from European Court of Human Rights based on given facts?
 
Thus handicapped Finnish patient's - who's injury caused by an accident, a traffic accident or a malpractice - Human Rights have been forfeit.
 
First corrupt abscess level are insurance doctors, which have spread all over and practice in Finland as USA gangsters at the time; filled with insurance companies and all appellate instances including National Authority for Medicolegal Affairs (which should be an independent statement provider).
 
Climax to all previously mentioned are insurance companies paying annual expense to previously told appellate instances, and end of the tail is judge Pellonpää as a sitting judge in European Court of Human Rights.
 
Did you know that over 200 pain patient suicide annually due to these criminal acts committed by insurance doctors?
 
Please do try to amuse yourselves with this fact my honoured Finnish citizen of well-fare and legal state!
 
Previously told article is a solid fact in s.c. 'western well-fare and legal state' in 2005, and issue is dealing thousands of handicapped citizen.

Helsinki - Finland 29.05.2006

Sincerely,

Hannu Kukkonen                                 Kalevi Hautakangas

tiedotus@oikeusturvanperikato.info